* Base author reaction functionality
* Get logic more in place
* Finalize tests
* Add admin clause for new user points
* Add proper registered_at for seeded user
* Fix regsitered_at in e2e
* Add registered_at across the board in e2e tests
* Update comments
* Update spec/models/reaction_spec.rb
Co-authored-by: Jamie Gaskins <jamie@forem.com>
* Update spec/models/reaction_spec.rb
Co-authored-by: Jamie Gaskins <jamie@forem.com>
* Update spec/models/reaction_spec.rb
Co-authored-by: Jamie Gaskins <jamie@forem.com>
* Put points in constant and refactor points resave logic
Co-authored-by: Jamie Gaskins <jamie@forem.com>
The fundamental goal in this refactor is to make it easier to disable the
Listings feature set. By extracting a routes file (via the `draw` method [see
implementation details][1]), we can more easily disable those routes _en
masse_. This "crease in the code" could mean that we wouldn't need to update
the controller action logic. An update of that logic might mean going into
each controller action related to listing and adding a conditional for render
404 when listing is disabled.
Now, on to why this should work (not I did not open the application and click
around, but instead went with a "let the framework help me" mindset).
I believe that this should work; though there's a caveat†. Here's why I
believe this will work for extracting the listing routes:
Before making changes I ran the following:
```sh
$ rails routes | sort > original-routes.txt
```
Let's break that down:
- `rails routes` :: renders the routing table for Rails; this is how
Rails converts routes to the magic of stuff like `article_path(:id)`
- `| sort` :: to sort the results
- `> original-routes.txt` :: to write the results into a file.
Then I made the changes and ran the following:
```sh
$ rails routes | sort > updated-listing-routes.txt
```
And finally, I ran:
```sh
$ diff updated-routes.txt original-routes.txt
```
The results were as follows:
```sh
500c500
< api_organization_listings GET (/locale/:locale)/api/organizations/:organization_username/listings(.:format) api/v0/organizations#listings {:locale=>nil, :format=>"json", :to=>"organizations#listings"}
---
> api_organization_listings GET (/locale/:locale)/api/organizations/:organization_username/listings(.:format) api/v0/organizations#listings {:locale=>nil, :format=>"json"}
```
Note the only difference is that the above two lines, one has
`:to=>"organizations#listings"` and the other does not. However, the
`./spec/requests/api/v0/organizations_spec.rb` exercises the route; so I
assume a hiccup/foible in the route reporting.
There was no difference between the before and after files.
† Caveat: if for some reason the order of the routes mattered, this will
have messed that up. I don't think that is the case, but we shall see.
Related to forem/rfcs#291 and #16335
* Initial statement of intent regarding Listings
I want to use this pull request as a means of conveying intended
direction; namely that we want Forem administrators to be able to toggle
off (or on) the Listing feature set.
This refactor is a first, yet incomplete pass, that doesn't make the
code worse. Expect more of a similar vein as we work to put the Listing
feature set behind a feature flag.
Related https://github.com/forem/rfcs/issues/291
* Adding feature flag based on reviewer comment
Prior to this commit, we were treating all NavigationLink attributes as
unique. So, were we to change a position of one of the NavigationLinks
during the add_navigation_links rake task, we would have created a new
NavigationLink (and the only one would have remained).
With this commit, we're introducing the concept of the NavigationLink's
surrogate identity, that is to say if we have two NavigationLink objects
with the same `url` and `name` we should consider them the same
NavigationLink. This allows us to update properties of those
NavigationLinks (via the rake task) without the risk of creating new
entries.
This unblocks PR #16268 which addresses #16076.
The hotness score is an "opaque to our users" score, it reflects
"activity" on the tag. However, by also showing the number of tags on
the associated view, there's a bit of a head scratcher when a "hotter"
tag with less tags is rendered ahead of a popular tag.
Closes#16321
This is meant as a conversation. Throughout the code-base we have have
`Tag.order(hotness_score: :desc)` and with PR #16322 we'll also have
`Tag.order(taggings_count: :desc)`.
My understanding is that if we have sorting, we might want to consider
an index. I put this forward as a conversation with a possible quick win.
Related to #16322
* Ensuring we fetch latest podcasts by pubDate
Prior to this commit, we fetched the podcasts that were the first(:limit)
XML `item` nodes in the RSS feed. Some folks might choose to list those
in descending pubDate order, while others list in ascending pubDate
order.
Closes#3580
* Bump for travis
* Added tag search to nav menu
* Added tag search
* Improved tags search results view
* Removed commented lines from the controller
* Fix specs for Search::Tag
* Prepare for tags search pagination
* Fixed Search::Tag specs
* styling
Co-authored-by: Paweł Ludwiczak <ludwiczakpawel@gmail.com>
* Convert symbol hash keys to strings when calling .perform_async
Fixes a warning from Sidekiq 6.4.0+ about perform_async arguments
which are not equal when passed to perform (`JSON.parse(JSON.dump(arg))`
should equal arg).
This is a safety measure to prevent passing objects (like classes, or
model instances) rather than their representations (like a class name,
or a model's attributes hash).
This warning will be an error in sidekiq 7
* Turn warning into an error in non-production environments
* Use string keys for reaction notification and article fetched
Missed these two on the first pass
* Update example argument hashes for #enqueues_on_correct_queue
Since this calls perform_async under the hood we need to pass json
safe hashes in the test cases as well.
https://github.com/forem/forem/blob/main/spec/workers/shared_examples/enqueues_on_correct_queue.rb
* Convert keys from FollowData#to_h to string before perform_async
I'm not sure enough where else (outside of notification) to_h is being
called, so I'm converting here when building args, rather than in
FollowData#to_h, which might be my next step.
* Let FollowData#to_h return a hash with string keys
Update spec to use string keys as well.
* Make to_h return string keys for ReactionData
Like FollowData, the #to_h method is only used to call
notifications (this is used to enqueue sidekiq jobs).
* Remove a key that was in the hash
Since reaction_data calls to_h, it gets string and not symbol,
keys. Call Hash#except with a key that was actually there.
* Refactoring cached_followed_tags
This refactor consolidates two queries and a loop into a single query.
One thing that is unclear is if we're ever really clearing the cache of
the user by id?
What follows is un-related to the refactor but appears to be related to #14937.
> First, I see we set a cache here:
>
> ebdaaaf15b/app/decorators/user_decorator.rb (L23-L34)
>
> But when I look at what busts the user cache, it doesn’t look like we’re busting it for the above cached location:
>
> ebdaaaf15b/app/services/edge_cache/bust_user.rb (L3-L22)
>
> What if anything am I missing in regards to cache busting?
* Adding some deprecated methods
* Updating documentation
* Bump for travis
* Bump for travis
* Updating comments to fix confusion
NOTE: I might be introducing more confusion, but at least
I'm addressing the prior confusion.
* Bump for travis
* Updating so we don't cache ActiveRecord objects
* Selecting only applicable attributes for caching
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Michael Kohl <citizen428@forem.com>
* Adjusting code based on feedback
* Bump for travis
* Bump for travis
* Update app/decorators/user_decorator.rb
Co-authored-by: Michael Kohl <citizen428@forem.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Kohl <citizen428@forem.com>
