* Fixing variant query specs
As I was working on adding a new variant, I discovered that not all of
our variants were being tested. This had to do with a faulty assumption
regarding the scoping of the `variant` local variable.
The change ensures that we declare a subject once for each defined
variant within their own `describe` block. Without that `describe`
block, you end up repurposing the same subject.
I found this because I made a deliberate error in the upcoming variant
and checked the tests. They passed.
Related to forem/forem#17584
* Update spec/services/articles/feeds/variant_query_spec.rb
Co-authored-by: Julianna Tetreault <32834804+juliannatetreault@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update spec/services/articles/feeds/variant_query_spec.rb
Co-authored-by: Julianna Tetreault <32834804+juliannatetreault@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Julianna Tetreault <32834804+juliannatetreault@users.noreply.github.com>
* Adding new relevancy lever for privileged reactions
This PR includes four changes:
1. Renaming the variant to remove Jennie's name
2. Starting a new experiment
3. Adding a new relevancy lever
4. Adding a new variant that uses the relevancy lever
1 and 2 is somewhat straight-forward.
For 3, we're looking at having a total of 5 "slots" for privileged user
reactions. Hence the four boundary values.
For 4, we're configuring the granular levers with the following:
- `[-∞..-5)` should have a 0.05
- `[-5..0)` should have a 0.5
- `[0..5)` should have a 0.9
- `[5..10)` should have a 0.98
- `[10..∞)` should have a 1.0
The 20220509-variant.json is a copy of 20220422-variant.json but
replaces the `privileged_user_reaction` lever with the
`privileged_user_reaction_granular` lever.
Below is the diff to highlight the similarities and differences between
the two variants.
```shell
❯ diff config/feed-variants/20220509-variant.json config/feed-variants/20220422-variant.json
90c90
< "privileged_user_reaction_granular": {
---
> "privileged_user_reaction": {
92,96c92,93
< [-2, 0.05],
< [-1, 0.5],
< [0, 0.9],
< [1, 0.98],
< [2, 1]
---
> [-1, 0.2],
> [1, 1]
98,102c95,97
< "fallback": 0.9,
< "very_negative_reaction_threshold": -5,
< "negative_reaction_threshold": 0,
< "positive_reaction_threshold": 5,
< "very_positive_reaction_threshold": 10
---
> "fallback": 0.95,
> "negative_reaction_threshold": -10,
> "positive_reaction_threshold": 10
```
Closesforem/forem#17584
* Update app/models/articles/feeds.rb
Co-authored-by: Josh Puetz <josh@dev.to>
* Adjusting testing logic to reflect latest experiment
* Adjusting negative threshold
Co-authored-by: Josh Puetz <josh@dev.to>
* test(cover-image): uses correct queries for ui unit tests
* test(form): replaces queries to getByRole and adds expect where necessary
* feat(help): adds expect assert and uses within to test inside specific block
* feat(image-uploader): uses correct queries to validate behaviour
* test: corrects queries and adds expect assertions to some unit tests
* Adds an empty state to the GDPR delete requests table
* Refactors and fixes gdprDeleteRequests.spec.js
* Updates aria-describedby for the GDPR delete requests table
* Adding a field test option for post publishing goals
We have page view and comment view "goals" but have not looked at
publication "goals". We're using these "goals" to help us refine the
feed towards sustainable engagement and community health.
The conjecture on publication goals is that the content on the feed
itself can nudge folks in their decision to publish posts.
Closesforem/forem#17585
* Fixing broken test
Prior to this commit, the SQL fragments included variables that were set
configured at a global level.
With this commit, we're now saying that each lever "knows" what variable
it needs; and providing the means at lever declaration time to "say"
what those variable names are. (e.g. `Articles::Feeds::LEVER_CATALOG`).
Then as part of the variant configuration (in the
`./config/feed-variants/*.json` files) we now include the expected value
of those parameters; which by convention (and coercion) are integers.
This relates to forem/forem#17584 because we want to move from a
privileged user reaction that has two values (`negative` and `positive`)
into four values (`very_negative`, `negative`, `positive`, and
`very_positive`). To do that, we'll create a new lever; but that's for
another pull request.
* Bump katex from 0.8.0 to 0.9.0
Bumps [katex](https://github.com/glebm/katex-ruby) from 0.8.0 to 0.9.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/glebm/katex-ruby/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/glebm/katex-ruby/blob/main/CHANGES.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/glebm/katex-ruby/compare/v0.8.0...v0.9.0)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: katex
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
* Update test to "definitely invalid" syntax
Previously, \\c was invalid. However, it is now parseable for whatever reason.
This adds an unterminated { to raise a syntax error.
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andy Z <17884966+Zhao-Andy@users.noreply.github.com>
* WIP: Adds an empty state to the invitations table
* Pulls invited member empty state into partial
* WIP: Center empty state within invited members table body
* Removes partial and adjusts empty space styling
* Adds an e2e for the empty state to invitedUsers.spec.js
* Moves empty state outside of table and adds aria-describedby to table
* Update app/views/admin/invitations/index.html.erb
Co-authored-by: Suzanne Aitchison <suzanne@forem.com>
* Adjusts ara-describedby erb tag
* Updates the route used within invitedUsers.spec.js to fix e2e failure
Co-authored-by: Suzanne Aitchison <suzanne@forem.com>
* update Modal to add sheet variant
* dont use prompt title for modal sheet stories, to better reflect intended purpose
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Julianna Tetreault <32834804+juliannatetreault@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Julianna Tetreault <32834804+juliannatetreault@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat: update all the paths as a first order of business
* feat: update all the folders to no longer appear under users
* feat: update specs
* feat: update specs
* feat: remove User namespace
* feat: remove route namespace
* feat: path change
* feat: move the menu items to the sidebar
* feat: add a badge
* feat: remove tabs partial
* xs font
* feat: update describe blocks
* feat: update cypress tests
* chore: oops member_manager instead of member_management
* feat: c-indicator
* feat: update the tests
* feat: update the gdpr test
* feat: add the invitations
* chore: align
* feat: update the GDPR constant
* feat: rename to GDPR actions
* feat: add member manager route
* Moving Experiments into AbExperiment namespace
This commit entails two major concepts:
1. Extracting logic out of a worker.
2. Cleaning the conditions in which we convert experiments.
In addition, I revisited some spec names to tidy them up for
clarification and structure.
**Extracting Logic...**
For workers, my preference is that they be a simple router to another
object. A non-worker object, with it's initialize method, can both
better manage instance variables. Further, workers are somewhat "flat"
in hierarchy,
In this case, having the AbExperiment be knowledgeable both in setting
the experiment and handling conversions makes (to me) organizational
sense. For example, the AbExperiment is constructed as a wrapper to the
FieldTest gem. But the RecordFieldTestEventWorker had knowledge of
FieldTest.
With this refactor, it does not have that knowledge. This also provided
an opportunity to replace magic strings with constants.
**Cleaning the conditions...**
This relates directly to and closesforem/forem#17530. I was looking at
the experiments after 2 days, and realized that there shouldn't be
results for
`user_views_pages_on_at_least_nine_different_days_within_two_weeks`;
after all the experiment started 2 days ago, how can we have results
that look at 2 weeks.
By adding the "max" function calls, we ensure a clear boundary of
"before the experiment began" versus "while the experiment is running".
Closesforem/forem#17530
* Update spec/models/ab_experiment_spec.rb
Co-authored-by: Mac Siri <krairit.siri@gmail.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Julianna Tetreault <32834804+juliannatetreault@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mac Siri <krairit.siri@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Julianna Tetreault <32834804+juliannatetreault@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat: update all the paths as a first order of business
* feat: update all the folders to no longer appear under users
* feat: update specs
* feat: update specs
* feat: remove User namespace
* feat: remove route namespace
* feat: path change
* feat: update url
