* Adding documentation and constant
This loosely relates to a request for information from Success team
about whether or not viewing a draft article counts towards it's stats.
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Suzanne Aitchison <suzanne@forem.com>
Co-authored-by: Suzanne Aitchison <suzanne@forem.com>
* Restoring tracking of custom impressions without GA
In #15967 I (@jeremyf) introduced the "don't do tracking if Google
Analytics ID is blank". However, we still likely want to
trackCustomImpressions().
Further, I did some sleuthing and adding a couple of comments on whether
we should record page views for articles in draft status or any views by
the author.
* Ensuring we don't track views of author or unpublished
Prior to this commit, I was surprised to learn that we:
1) Tracked an author's view of their article.
2) Tracked views of an unpublished article.
This came up from a Forem creator asking if they could reset the view
counter. Or trigger the reset on publication.
I think a general business logic policy of don't track views for the
author and don't track views for unpublished articles is a reasonable
default.
Were we to pursue the clear views on publication, we'd need to consider
something that went from unpublished -> published -> unpublished ->
published. Without a more explicit state machine, triggering a
busineiss logic behavior seems a bit unexpected.
In other words, I wrote an article. There are 20 views when I realize
that I need to unpublished it. I make the changes in the unpublished
state, and re-publish. I'd assume that those 20 views would still be
"recorded" and counted towards my article's view counts.
* Revert "Ensuring we don't track views of author or unpublished"
This reverts commit 321ecbed0ac4552e175d39bf17655a2fc93b265c.
In my quest to find `where(attribute: value)` in controllers and even
services, I stumbled upon this pattern.
As of this commit (and prior) an Article's associated user is it's author.
* Don't update social information for suspended/banished accounts
* Prevent suspended users/accounts from updating their profile information
* Add tests and fix some logic
* feat: hide the logo_svg behaind a featur flag if we've ennabled it
* feat: show the input field iis the feature flag is enabled
* feat: show the new logo when the feature fkag is enabled
* chore: change working
* feat: add a logo spec
* fix: with the updated changes we show a community name if there is no logo, hence we sometimes would need to update the community name instead of the logo on preview
* fix: use innerText
* Update app/javascript/admin/controllers/config_controller.js
Co-authored-by: Julianna Tetreault <32834804+juliannatetreault@users.noreply.github.com>
* empty commiit
* empty commiit
Co-authored-by: Julianna Tetreault <32834804+juliannatetreault@users.noreply.github.com>
Prior to this commit, I was seeing a "warning: nested repeat operator
'+' and '?' was replaced with '*' in regular expression"
```shell
> bundle exec rspec spec/liquid_tags/organization_tag_spec.rb
./app/liquid_tags/organization_tag.rb:5: warning: nested repeat operator '+' and '?' was replaced with '*' in regular expression
[Zonebie] Setting timezone: ZONEBIE_TZ="Dublin"
...
Finished in 0.39363 seconds (files took 2.89 seconds to load)
3 examples, 0 failures
```
After this change, when I run the same spec I get the following:
```shell
❯ bundle exec rspec spec/liquid_tags/organization_tag_spec.rb
[Zonebie] Setting timezone: ZONEBIE_TZ="Saskatchewan"
...
Finished in 0.39327 seconds (files took 3.03 seconds to load)
3 examples, 0 failures
```
The warning is gone.
Originally, I had changed `(?:[\w-]+)?` to `(?:[\w-]*)` which resolved
the warning.
But lookinig a bit further, we didn't need that
non-capturing group at all (`(?:[\w-]*)` is equivalent to `[\w-]*`). So
I further condensed this down by removing it. Likewise we my
understanding of regex is that `(?:/)?` is equivalent to `/?`.
So I stripped things further out.
I also noted a lingering issue to consider regarding what to do about
a URL that isn't an organization. This is a larger issue to consider as
we bring in Embed tags that are for Forem resources.
This change restores setting usernames to something less obnoxious.
Prior to this commit, I would on occassion get the following error in
seeds:
```shell
❯ bin/rails db:seed
Seeding with multiplication factor: 1
1. Creating Organizations.
2. Creating 10 Users.
rake aborted!
ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: Validation failed: Username is too long (maximum is 30 characters)
./forem/db/seeds.rb:67:in `block (2 levels) in <main>'
./forem/db/seeds.rb:60:in `times'
./forem/db/seeds.rb:60:in `block in <main>'
./forem/app/lib/seeder.rb:30:in `create_if_none'
./forem/db/seeds.rb:57:in `<main>'
<internal:~/.rbenv/versions/3.0.2/lib/ruby/3.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:85:in `require'
<internal:~/.rbenv/versions/3.0.2/lib/ruby/3.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:85:in `require'
-e:1:in `<main>'
Tasks: TOP => db:seed
(See full trace by running task with --trace)
```
Related to work done in #16067
Prior to this commit, we were somewhat naively rendering Hash style data
attributes in our ERB templates. By rendering each hash attribute
separately, we were rendering characters that could break the
javascript (e.g. double hack or backslash `"` or `\`).
By moving to this view_object rendering, we leverage Rails's `to_json`
behavior to ensure properly escaped values. As part of this exercise, I
generalized the method to allow for other places to benefit from this
behavior.
This generalization also helps ensure that we have a more conformant
rendering (e.g. we should always have an :id, :className, and :name
value in our data-info hash).
_Note: I've updated the user's names for Cypress tests as they are more
likely to catch the particular issue than anything else. I assume that
I'm going to break some cypress tests and will need some help fixing
them._
Closes#15916, #14704
Supersedes #15983
How to test locally:
Assuming you have seeded database (e.g. `rails db:seed`), checkout the
"main" branch. Then in `rails console` find a user that's written articles:
```ruby
user = Article.last.user
user.update(name: "\\: #{user.name}")
user.articles.each(&:save)
```
Now, again on the "main" branch, start your application (e.g.,
`bin/startup`).
Then get a logged in and a logged out browser session going. Open your
web inspector and open console. Then go to the local instances homepage
(e.g., http://localhost:3000) and look for JS errors.
On the main branch, you should see an exception around
`JSON.parse(button.data.info)` (assuming that the `user`'s article is
rendered on the homepage).
Then go to the user's page (e.g. https://localhost:3000/:user-slug) and
look for JS parse errors.
On this PR's branch (e.g.,
`jeremyf/take-two-at-resolving-gh-15916`)
you shouldn't see those console errors.
More importantly, the Follow buttons should work.
* updates
* updating doc
* Fixed broken documentation in Storybook stories.
* bring back a element
* md --> mdx
* c-* doc update
Co-authored-by: Nick Taylor <nick@dev.to>
* Add validations and constants for feed_style and strategy
* Convert text fields w/ static options to dropdowns
* Convert Bootstrap selectpicker to native HTML select tag
* Update test to use valid feed strategy
I was working on another branch and as part of my commit, Rubocop
removed a validation (but not the spec that asserted the validation).
Below is the "non-updating" rubocop offense on the other branch.
```shell
❯ rubocop ./app/models/notification_subscription.rb
Inspecting 1 file
C
Offenses:
app/models/notification_subscription.rb:13:29: C: [Correctable]
Rails/RedundantPresenceValidationOnBelongsTo: Remove explicit presence
validation for notifiable_id.
validates :notifiable_id, presence: true
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1 file inspected, 1 offense detected, 1 offense auto-correctable
```
To remediate, I ran:
```shell
> rubocop --only "Rails/RedundantPresenceValidationOnBelongsTo" \
--auto-correct
```
This resolved the `app/models`. Then did some regex magic and removed
the assertions from `spec/models`.
For Forem folks, I wrote a [forem.team post][1] discuss if this is how
we want to proceed.
[1]:https://forem.team/jeremy/rubocop-auto-updating-mayhem-33a6
In Travis I found the following message:
> Using `should` from rspec-expectations' old `:should` syntax without
> explicitly enabling the syntax is deprecated. Use the new `:expect`
> syntax or explicitly enable `:should` with
> `config.expect_with(:rspec) > { |c| c.syntax = :should }`
> instead. Called from
> /home/travis/build/forem/forem/spec/models/html_variant_spec.rb:76:in
> `block (2 levels) in <main>'.
