When we merge this, Forem admins will see the "Admin > Content Manager >
Spaces" section in their Admin area. This will then allow them to
toggle on and off spaces.
Closesforem/forem#17161
* Don't create podcast episodes without a media_url
There is an early return from add_media_url to prevent using an empty
enclosure_url, which avoids errors in
`GetMediaUrl.call(a_blank_value)`, however there's also a not null
constraint on podcast_episodes.media_url in the database, which causes
upsert to raise an error.
Returning early here avoids the error (which had halted the worker).
See also
https://app.honeybadger.io/projects/66984/faults/80833402
This error happens regularly, 96 times per day in DEV, it looks like at least
one podcast feed_url is for an rss feed filtered by /tag/podcast/,
(and at least one post was tagged "podcast" but didn't include any
media to get).
My understanding is at worst we'll ignore the error silently.
* Add test cases
given a blog post (not a podcast episode, no media url), don't raise
any error, don't create any episode.
Included codepunk.io feed that was showing this issue initially.
* Prefer compact_blank! to delete_if blank
Rubocop suggested this. Why would I argue.
* When sort_direction is anything other than asc or desc, remove it
There is initializer code in the search/query classes that handles nil
sort_direction by adding a default value, so deleting the sort
direction is reasonable here.
* Set a default sort direction for articles of :desc
* Only sort if sort_direction and sort_by are present
* Add test case for article search with invalid parameter
You had a good ride, but your successor, the
`Articles::Feeds::VariantQuery`, is doing well in production. And has
been for quite awhile.
You helped us get to a better spot in regards to the feed algorithm, but
your time has come to rest as a memory in our git history.
* Rename unsubscribe to remove_from_mailchimp_newsletters
* Permanently delete from mailchimp instead of unsubscribing
* Rename method and remove comment
* Don't use i18n because of error message
We don't want to use i18n here because e.title comes from the error response. If a Forem
was using a different locale and Mailchimp for newsletters, they would still receive the
error response in English (because of Mailchimp).
* Refactor and rename a bit
* Rename methods in tests accordingly
* Remove now moot test
* Rename method in other places it was previously called
* Remove unused translation, see 62fee247ee2565e4d3d14919a8636a76ce5ecc9f
* Fix typo and report error if not 404
As I was looking into the implementation details of the `/t/:tag_name`
relevancy feed I noticed an instance variable that we do not need.
Below are the results of looking for the instance_variable
`@article_index` or a potential `article_index` local variable or method name.
```shell
❯ rg "@?article_index"
app/controllers/stories_controller.rb
28: @article_index = true
131: @article_index = true
162: @organization_article_index = true
app/controllers/stories/tagged_articles_controller.rb
18: @article_index = true
app/controllers/stories/articles_search_controller.rb
7: @article_index = true
app/views/articles/_single_story.html.erb
26: <% if story.cached_organization && !@organization_article_index %>
32: <a href="/<%= story.cached_user.username %>" class="crayons-avatar <% if story.cached_organization && !@organization_article_index %> crayons-avatar--s absolute -right-2 -bottom-2 border-solid border-2 border-base-inverted <% else %> crayons-avatar--l <% end %> ">
79: <% if story.cached_organization && !@organization_article_index %>
```
* feat: remove feature flag on the member index view and re-arrange some partials
* feat: remove Feature Flag for the invitations view
* feat: remove Feature Flag for the gdpr view
* feat: remove Feature Flag for the controls
* feat: remove the feature flag in the tests
* remove extra queries that we no longer use
* Update app/views/admin/invitations/index.html.erb
Co-authored-by: Suzanne Aitchison <suzanne@forem.com>
* Update app/views/admin/invitations/index.html.erb
Co-authored-by: Suzanne Aitchison <suzanne@forem.com>
* Update app/views/admin/users/index/_controls.html.erb
Co-authored-by: Suzanne Aitchison <suzanne@forem.com>
* Update app/views/admin/users/gdpr_delete_requests/index.html.erb
Co-authored-by: Suzanne Aitchison <suzanne@forem.com>
* Update cypress/integration/seededFlows/adminFlows/users/userIndexView.spec.js
Co-authored-by: Suzanne Aitchison <suzanne@forem.com>
* Update cypress/integration/seededFlows/adminFlows/users/userIndexView.spec.js
Co-authored-by: Suzanne Aitchison <suzanne@forem.com>
* Update app/views/admin/users/gdpr_delete_requests/index.html.erb
Co-authored-by: Suzanne Aitchison <suzanne@forem.com>
* feat: attempt to fix Cypress test
* fix: soem other cypress tests
* fix: search bar
Co-authored-by: Suzanne Aitchison <suzanne@forem.com>
This commit does three things:
1. Breaks the inheritance of the VariantQuery.
2. Revisits the in-line documentation to better reflect current state.
3. Removes branching logic that we don't need.
My goal is to have a VariantQuery that is what we need, conforms to the
method interface of WeightedQueryStrategy but does not rely on it.
After we merge this, we can observe if things break on DEV and fallback
to WeightedQueryStrategy if this doesn't work. Once the
`Articles::Feeds::VariantQuery` has fledged on it's own, we can remove
the feature flag and then finally remove the weighted query strategy.
But that's the future steps.
Related to forem/forem#17393
* Update sort to have nulls at last
* Updating Article.sorting by published to only include published
Co-authored-by: Jeremy Friesen <jeremy.n.friesen@gmail.com>
* Allowing VariantQuery for Feed Generation
Apologies for the breadth of this pull request, I had considered many
small commits, but felt that would've been more effort for the value
provided.
This commit includes the following:
- Documentation updates to the feed variant (though not the final pass)
- Renaming and adding RelevancyLevers that help differentiate
- Adding RelevancyLever#range to provide documentation
- Reducing redundent controller logic by making a
`Articles::Feeds.feed_for` method.
- Adding some configuration validation for RelevancyLevers
- Adding constants for better clarification
- Testing unhappy paths for feed configuration
- Adjusting the module namespace of some objects
- Exposing top-level configurations for variants (along with their
defaults)
- Creating the VariantyQuery that at present inherits from the
`Articles::Feeds::WeightedQueryStrategy`
As implemented, we can deploy this code to production without using the
new VariantQuery. Once we toggle on the
`:feed_uses_variant_query_feature` FeatureFlag, it will switch to using
the VariantQuery. The VariantQuery's two variants and the
internal configuration of `Articles::Feeds::WeightedQueryStrategy`
produce the same query.
The goal of this factor is to allow for a quick on and off toggle of the
feed query; to ensure that what we introduce remains performant.
- Closesforem/forem#17272
- Closesforem/forem#17276
- Closesforem/forem#17216
In addition, I will be recording a code-walkthrough and linking that
recording to the pull request.
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Mac Siri <krairit.siri@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mac Siri <krairit.siri@gmail.com>
We avoid busting a user cache for 15 minutes but the tag cache is 5
hours. So we want to "nudge things along".
What this is trying to solve is the server side rendering of whether we
hide or show a button.
Related to forem/forem#17324
Related to forem/forem#17119
**tl;dr** This PR is looking to provide a means to programmatically
assemble, from system configurations, what is currently the
[Articles::Feeds::WeightedQueryStrategy::SCORING_METHOD_CONFIGURATIONS][1].
Once we merge this PR, instead of having that constant, we'll initialize
the Articles::Feeds::WeightedQueryStrategy with the variant
configuration that we've assembled.
**Introduction**
This pull request has quite a bit going on, but as of now the production
code does not use any of it.
*Note: None of this code is bleeding into production code paths.*
Put your Ruby hat on and let's go for a ride. And apologizes for not
making this a smaller pull request. As I built this, I made many small
commits, but this became the smallest commit that provided the most
context without integrating into production code.
Before we get started, you may want to familiarize yourself with where
we're going. The `./app/models/articles/feeds/README.md` provides
further guidance; but fair warning reader, I have not reconciled the
README's language with what emerged as I wrote this pull request.
Those of you who are part of Forem Core team, you can read the
[Refinements to Our Present Feed Configuration][2]
to provide some insight into what's happening.
**Why not reconcile?** *Because I want to have all of the language and
thoughts available for you to help consider how best to name and model
this.*
**On to the Review**
The purpose of this pull request is to provide a mechanism for
engineering to provide a series of variant query levers. And to allow
us to easily configure those available query levers into a variant
query.
*Why the mix of Ruby configuration and JSON?*
The Ruby levers are meant to indicate that this is code we don't want to
expose in text based configuration because it might create SQL inject
points. (More on that when we integrate the code of this PR into the
production implementation)
The JSON levers are meant to indicate that "anyone" can pick the
appropriate/available levers and configure how they are set. In other
words, these values do not create SQL injection issues.
**What I Need from You**
I am putting this forward as a draft so you can read this code ahead of
time. I'm then going to schedule a synchronous code review where we
record our collective walk through of the implementation.
Closes:
- forem/forem#17268
- forem/forem#17269
- forem/forem#17270
- forem/forem#17271
- forem/forem#17273
Relates to:
- forem/forem#17308
- forem/forem#17245
[1]:6818ef3ed0/app/services/articles/feeds/weighted_query_strategy.rb (L84-L231)
[2]:https://forem.team/jeremy/refinements-to-our-present-feed-configuration-1p0c
From Anuj:
> Going forward we will be using heavy font-weight for the titles of all
> the admin sections. So it’s good consistency-wise.
This resolves that issue.
Closesforem/forem#17327
This div tag is subsumed by the line below (e.g. `<%=
application_policy_content_tag("div"...`). When the unclosed div is
present there is some undesirable layout offset. When it's removed,
things line up a bit nicer.
Discovered while attempting to reproduce forem/forem#17324
This commit modifies two things:
1. The sort order of the feed.
2. Locking in the next incumbent for the feed.
In consultation with Jamie regarding the SQL, I've switched from a WHERE
IN type clause to creating a JOIN. This allows for the calculated
relevancy score to become a sortable value for the feed.
Second the incumbent feed is a slight modification of the past winner;
based on the results of a long running experiment. This adjustment is
per conversations with product.
The past experiment ran since early February, so it's time to retire it,
regroup and move forward.
Closesforem/forem#17307
* add expandable search control at mobile size
* add invitations smaller layout
* replace missing member image
* tweaks following merge
* minor layout tweaks
* add actions to smaller view, update cypress specs
* ContextNotification model
* Create and destroy context notifications when notifications are sent/unsent
* Added a transaction when creating notifications and context notifications
* Documentation for context notifications
There are two problems engrained in this:
1. The undocumented expectation of `/new` needed to other sites linking
with prefill information.
2. The prefill parameters being lost during the authentication process.
The first bug was introduced as part forem/forem#16536. The second is
likely introduced as part of a Rails upgrade (namely `request.path` most
likely once included the query parameters but with our current
implementation it does not).
Closesforem/forem#17292
Prior to this commit, we were looking at trusted user's reaction
counts. This is not the desired column to be testing.
See
f1d6291d00/app/models/reaction.rb (L25-L28)
```ruby
counter_culture :reactable,
column_name: proc { |model|
PUBLIC_CATEGORIES.include?(model.category) ? "public_reactions_count" : "reactions_count"
}
```
In the above code, all public reactions (hearts, unicorns, reading
list) go to public_reactions_count. Other things go to the
`reactions_count`; which is the thumbs up and thumbs down.
Fixesforem/forem#17260
