`User#trusted?` is more Ruby idiomatic than `User#trusted`. This helps
align the various "User#question?" methods.
I've added a deprecation warning, but don't believe that this is active
in the code-base.
* Rename SiteConfig
* More renaming
* Update spec
* Update mandatory settings mapping
* More renaming
* e2e test fixes
* You have a rename, and you have a rename
* Spec fix
* More changes
* Temporarily disable specs
* After-merge update
* Undo rename for migration
* undo rename of DUS
* Fix DUS
* Fix merge problem
* Remove redundant DUS
* Fix specs
* Remove unused code
* Change wrong class name
* More cleanup
* Re-add missing values to constant
* Fix constant
* Fix spec
* Remove obsolete fields
* Add accidentally removed field
* Update spec
* Move methods from Settings::General to ForemInstance
* Remove unneeded model
* Change mentions of 'site config'
* Rename banned and comment_banned roles
* Add data update script to rename roles containing 'ban'
* Add named error for Suspended users
* Update unidiomatic method names
* Rename misc banned to suspended
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Michael Kohl <me@citizen428.net>
* Add unit tests for suspended methods
This commit also adds TODO comments for removing banned and
comment_banned from the codebase after data update scripts have
successfully run on all of our Forems.
Co-authored-by: Michael Kohl <me@citizen428.net>
* Split ReCaptcha service and use verbs instead of pronouns
* Inline comment rewrite for clarify
* after? > >
* Use explicit role check for the user instead of .auditable?
