* Convert symbol hash keys to strings when calling .perform_async
Fixes a warning from Sidekiq 6.4.0+ about perform_async arguments
which are not equal when passed to perform (`JSON.parse(JSON.dump(arg))`
should equal arg).
This is a safety measure to prevent passing objects (like classes, or
model instances) rather than their representations (like a class name,
or a model's attributes hash).
This warning will be an error in sidekiq 7
* Turn warning into an error in non-production environments
* Use string keys for reaction notification and article fetched
Missed these two on the first pass
* Update example argument hashes for #enqueues_on_correct_queue
Since this calls perform_async under the hood we need to pass json
safe hashes in the test cases as well.
https://github.com/forem/forem/blob/main/spec/workers/shared_examples/enqueues_on_correct_queue.rb
* Convert keys from FollowData#to_h to string before perform_async
I'm not sure enough where else (outside of notification) to_h is being
called, so I'm converting here when building args, rather than in
FollowData#to_h, which might be my next step.
* Let FollowData#to_h return a hash with string keys
Update spec to use string keys as well.
* Make to_h return string keys for ReactionData
Like FollowData, the #to_h method is only used to call
notifications (this is used to enqueue sidekiq jobs).
* Remove a key that was in the hash
Since reaction_data calls to_h, it gets string and not symbol,
keys. Call Hash#except with a key that was actually there.
I saw the following error in Honeybadger:
```
[PROJECT_ROOT]/app/services/notifications/reactions/send.rb:61 :in `call`
old_json_data = notification.json_data
previous_siblings_size = notification.json_data["reaction"]["aggregated_siblings"].size if old_json_data
notification.json_data = json_data
[PROJECT_ROOT]/app/services/notifications/reactions/send.rb:20 :in `call`
[PROJECT_ROOT]/app/workers/notifications/new_reaction_worker.rb:16 :in `perform`
[PROJECT_ROOT]/app/models/notification.rb:84 :in `send_reaction_notification_without_delay`
[PROJECT_ROOT]/app/controllers/reactions_controller.rb:136 :in `destroy_reaction`
[PROJECT_ROOT]/app/controllers/reactions_controller.rb:168 :in `handle_existing_reaction`
[PROJECT_ROOT]/app/controllers/reactions_controller.rb:77 :in `create`
```
As I was exploring the error, I saw that we were making assumptions
about the data coercion. These are valid and somewhat stable
assumptions, but I wanted to look a little deeper into the situation.
This refactor helps consistently negotiate two situations where we're
transforming request-cycle models into lightweight data structures. It
also begins to show a path towards a generalizable "macro" for this behavior.
Related to #2122, #9534
* Clarify uncommunicative variables in labor classes
Single letter variable names are largely a question of preference, in
some cases I think that convention mitigates the opaque nature of single
letter variable names (e.g., e for error, i for index, etc).
However, in some cases they can be unclear and there isn't much reason
to use single letter variables unless for some reason character length is
really important.
In this case, I would prefer clarity in variable names over brevity of
code so I've used Reek to identify short variable names and I'm changing
them.
It's pretty boring, but hopefully incremental code love changes like
this one add up and improve readability and accessibility for those
interested in reading this codebase.
* Remove commented code from 2 years ago
* Clarify uncommunicative naming in services classes
There is some context for this change in 6b81880f
* Clarify uncommunicative naming in models
There is some context for this change in 6b81880f
* Clarify uncommunicative naming in liquid_tags
There is some context for this change in 6b81880f
